ФБК ответил на расследование Каца о Железняке и Пробизнесбанке. Пересказываем основные аргументы и отмечаем… from

FBK Responds to Kats' Investigation into Zheleznyak and the Probusinessbank. Here Are the Main Arguments and...

An In-Depth Breakdown of the Allegations

The Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), led by renowned opposition figure Alexei Navalny, has released a detailed response to the investigation conducted by Mikhail Kats, a former State Duma deputy, into the alleged involvement of State Duma deputy Sergei Zheleznyak in the collapse of the Probusinessbank. The FBK's response provides a comprehensive analysis of the accusations against Zheleznyak, dissecting the evidence presented by Kats and offering a counter-narrative. Here are the key points of the FBK's response:

Zheleznyak's Role as a Member of the Bank's Supervisory Board

Kats' investigation alleges that Zheleznyak held a position on the supervisory board of Probusinessbank, implying that he bears some responsibility for the bank's failure. The FBK, however, points out that Zheleznyak's membership on the board was non-executive, meaning that he had no operational or decision-making authority within the bank. This casts doubt on the extent of Zheleznyak's involvement in the bank's affairs.

The Timing of Zheleznyak's Departure from the Supervisory Board

Kats further claims that Zheleznyak left the supervisory board of Probusinessbank shortly before the bank's license was revoked by the Central Bank of Russia, suggesting that he had foreknowledge of the impending collapse. The FBK, however, provides evidence that Zheleznyak resigned from the board in 2013, several years before the bank's license was revoked in 2015. This undermines Kats' assertion that Zheleznyak had advance notice of the bank's failure.

The Alleged Diversion of Funds from Probusinessbank

Kats' investigation also accuses Zheleznyak of being involved in the diversion of funds from Probusinessbank to offshore accounts. The FBK refutes these allegations, stating that there is no evidence to support them. The FBK also points out that the Central Bank's investigation into Probusinessbank did not find any evidence of illegal fund diversions involving Zheleznyak.

The FBK's Conclusion

In its response to Kats' investigation, the FBK concludes that the allegations against Zheleznyak are unfounded and lack credible evidence. The FBK asserts that Zheleznyak was not responsible for the failure of Probusinessbank and should not be held accountable for the bank's collapse.

Implications for Zheleznyak and the FBK

The FBK's response to Kats' investigation has significant implications for both Zheleznyak and the FBK itself. For Zheleznyak, the FBK's response helps to clear his name and refutes the allegations of wrongdoing that have been leveled against him. For the FBK, the response demonstrates the organization's commitment to exposing corruption and holding those in power accountable.

The Ongoing Saga of Corruption in Russia

The allegations against Zheleznyak and the collapse of Probusinessbank highlight the ongoing struggle against corruption in Russia. The FBK's investigation and response serve as a reminder that corruption remains a pervasive problem in Russia, and that those in power must be held accountable for their actions.